Talk:Android and Resulting Lawsuits and Precedents

From CS378H Public Policy and the Digitally Native Technologist
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • Not completed yet--Wjm (talk) 15:04, 29 April 2015 (EDT)
  • The "Google vs. Oracle" section refers to an "initial case," but no context is given for what this case was. A link or explanation would be nice. Pvallone (talk) 15:07, 29 April 2015 (EDT) (with wjm, bs, ben, derenge)
  • Some of the quotations in the "Google vs Oracle" section lack citations for the quotes. Pvallone (talk) 15:09, 29 April 2015 (EDT) (with wjm, bs, ben, derenge)
  • Include more citations in the section about Oracle potentially requiring a license to use Java (User:bs)
  • For the anti-competition section, it would be nice if there was a brief explanation of what Android's competitors are doing to avoid and resolve anticompetitive lawsuits. Pvallone (talk) 15:14, 29 April 2015 (EDT) (with wjm, bs, ben, derenge)
  • Shouldn't things be completed by now? Stephen (talk) 15:17, 29 April 2015 (EDT)
  • There tend to not be spaces immediately before references, at least on Wikipedia. For example.<ref>Some page that doesn't exist (until someone creates it)</ref> Rather than. <ref>Some other page that doesn't exist (until someone creates it)</ref>
  • The [wat] reference is unprofessional..
  • Some of the Android, Inc. have commas and some don't. Should be consistent. Hperry (talk) 15:30, 29 April 2015 (EDT)
  • What is polymorphism with regards to operating systems. Hperry (talk) 15:30, 29 April 2015 (EDT)

For the record I didn't add that [wat] reference. Sathya (talk) 15:28, 29 April 2015 (EDT)

Polymorphism doesn't really seem to be the correct term to use here.

Maybe some background for how android functions in a business sense?

It would be good if you made it more clear why android in particular is in this situation. Like, stacking it up against iOS could on these issues could be useful.

You have a viciously incomplete sentence in the Google vs Oracle section.