CS378H Public Policy and the Digitally Native Technologist
Honors course. Meets in GDC 2.410 three hours per week: Monday 1-2pm and Wednesday 1-3pm
Instructor: Prof. William Press
Email: wpress@cs.utexas.edu
Office: POB 3.258
Office hours: Monday, 2-3pm (immediately after class), or arrange time by email
TAs: Urmilla Banerjee and John Hawkins
Prerequisites: Upper-division standing in Turing Scholars program or, with consent of instructor, in Dean's Scholars or Polymathic Scholars programs.
Spring, 2016.
Links to Google Groups or Docs
Our Google Group (for setting edit permissions if you post Google Docs): cs378h-2016@googlegroups.com
Upcoming Schedule
(Archived schedule events here.)
Wednesday, February 17. Start Driverless Car unit. Discuss seed documents and form groups (randomizer).
Monday, February 22. Detailed individual outlines by person due before class. In class, 5 minute presentations with 5 minute question and answer period from each group.
Course Description
Are you a digital native? How, and in what roles, can you influence public policy, now and in the future? This course will consider actual case studies as a way to provide practical experience in how policy is made, how to advise a President, a legislator, a judge, a CEO. Exercises may involve coding/scripting (for data collection, fusion, analysis), writing (communication of results to policy makers), and oral presentation.
Individually and in small teams, each student will participate in 4 or 5 topical units in the course of the semester. Each unit will have a fast research phase (starting with an introduction of the topic by the instructor), a writing component, an oral presentation component, and an instructor and peer assessment component. The purpose of each unit is to make a well-supported case to a (simulated) policy maker for a specific set of actions. Teamwork and appropriate division of effort, and fusion of results, will be required, but each student will him/herself do a significant amount of individual writing in each topical unit. Written exercises may include: a draft Presidential decision memo, a draft section of a Senate bill, a piece of an amicus brief to the Supreme Court.
For each topical unit, we will ask questions like these:
- What is the issue? What are the questions that we should be asking about the issue?
- What is known about the answers? Is there data? Could we get data? Where there is controversy, what are the different points of view?
- What economic interests are at stake? What societal interests (other than economic) are at stake?
- What are the policy levers, i.e., what can be changed? Who controls those levers?
- What do we actually want to happen? Who should do what?
- Can we produce a convincing case to motivate the relevant policy-makers to act?
Counts for writing flag.
Topical Units (2016)
Completed Topics
In Progress
Possibilities
- Who should own the Internet? (ICANN? IANA? ITU? countries?)
- Cybersecurity in commerce (e.g., Sony, Target, Home Depot)
- Jurisdiction for Borderless Cyberspace (e.g., search warrants)
- Bitcoin, TOR, and anonymity
- The Forensic Science of Digital Traces
- Digital Millennium Copyright Act: Changes needed?
- Airspace and the regulation of commercial drones
- The future "urban platform"
- The Healthcare.gov platform rollout fiasco
- High-tech public service: Who and How?
- Tesla and the Car Dealership Lobby
- The Economics of Digital Rights Management
- Edward Snowden: How much good? How much harm?
- How does Internet connectivity affect war? Warfighters? The public's perception of war?
- International technology regulations (e.g. EU vs Google)
- Net Neutrality and Internet.org
- More thorough background checks for lightsaber owners
- Digital Voting
- Laser regulation? (In light of recent incidents where lasers are being shown at passing airplanes)
- Cyber-safety/CS education for the general public
- Cyber-warfare, cyber-espionage, etc: Should the US consider these acts of war? How should we respond? What's at stake?
An interesting source of related topics is the Electronic Frontier Foundation's list of legal cases.
Student-Written Course Output
Public Policy on Selected Technology Issues: A Student-Produced Wiki (2016)
Above is the link to the main output of the course. All students are encouraged to edit all pages. Your overall contribution to this Wiki will be the main part of your course grade. Do not be shy about improving other students' contributions, under Wikipedia-style rules of courtesy (e.g., use the Discussion pages to explain/discuss/debate changes that might be controversial).
Completed units:
Individual Student Logs and Workspaces
Above is link to space for each student to develop draft contributions. You should not edit another student's work in this area, though you are free to read it. Although material in this area doesn't directly count for the course grade (until you copy it into the main Wiki), I will use it to track your progress. Please keep your work log up to date.
Archive from Spring, 2015 Class
Public Policy on Selected Technology Issues: A Student-Produced Wiki 2015
Aereo and Copyright Law
The Net Neutrality Debate
The Privacy and Big Data Debate
Patent Trolls: Time for Action?
Additional Topics Investigated (small teams or individuals, less depth)
- Autonomous Vehicles: Ground and Air and Water
- The Sharing Economy
- Disruptive Book Publishing: Amazon and Google
- Europe's War Against Google
- Math/CS Education Reform
- Android and Resulting Lawsuits and Precedents
Individual Student Logs and Workspaces 2015
2015 Contributions Summaries and Links
Other
- More on the Rationale for This Course
- General Stuff You Should Know about This Class and UT
- Link to the team randomizer
- Wiki contribution stats (4/6/15)
Getting started with the wiki
- A helpful MediaWiki tutorial (Google to find many more such tutorials on the web)
- Brief note on references and math notation in this Wiki
- Configuration settings list
- MediaWiki FAQ
- Cool URL Tricks for Google Docs